{"created":"2023-06-23T12:18:22.564324+00:00","id":162,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"e1a165ad-c1ba-40fc-bb4c-37e98aecee98"},"_deposit":{"created_by":21,"id":"162","owners":[21],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"162"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:niconurs.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000162","sets":["8:14:21"]},"author_link":["506","507","508"],"control_number":"162","item_3_biblio_info_6":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2001-12","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"75","bibliographicPageStart":"65","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"7","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"新潟県立看護短期大学紀要","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"}]}]},"item_3_description_4":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"平成11年度,平成12年度と2年間にわたり,基礎看護技術演習過程に対して,「看護系大学授業過程評価スケール<看護技術演習用>」を用い学生と教員による評価を行った.平成12年度の演習過程は,学生,教員とも中程度の平均的な演習であったと評価していた.教員の評価では,「点滴静脈内注射」において「学生間交流」,「学生・演習への態度・対応」の評価が低かった.学生と教員の評価を比較すると,教員の評価がほとんどの演習において低く,特に点差のみられた演習は,「点滴静脈内注射」であった.平成11年度学生と平成12年度学生の評価を比較すると,平成12年度学生の評価が低く,特に点差のみられた演習は「バイタルサインの測定」であった.評価の比較検討により,演習の時間配分,演習の内容と方法,教員の指導力の質が演習過程には重要であることを再認識した.","subitem_description_language":"ja","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"},{"subitem_description":"During the two-year period from 1999-2000, both students and teachers conducted an evaluation of basic nursing technique training using the nursing system university class process evaluation scale. Both the year-2000 students and teachers evaluated the training as moderate and average. The evaluation by the teachers was low for \"continuous infusion,\" \"information exchange among students\" and \"teachers attitudes / responses to the students and the class\". The teachers gave a lower evaluation for most training classes, when the evaluation of students and teachers were compared. In particular, the training class with the greatest difference in the score was \"continuous infusion\". The evaluations by the 1999-year students and 2000-year students were compared. The evaluations by the 2000-year students were low. In particular, the training class with the greatest difference in the score was \"measurement of the vital sign\". In the training class, it was realized again that time allocation of the training, content of the training and method, quality of the leadership of the teacher were important.","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_3_publisher_32":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"新潟県立看護短期大学紀要委員会","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"item_3_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN10556238","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_3_version_type_15":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"西脇,  洋子","creatorNameLang":"ja"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"岡村,  典子","creatorNameLang":"ja"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"小林,  ミチ子","creatorNameLang":"ja"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2015-11-16"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"70019-009.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"2.5 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"70019-009.pdf","url":"https://niconurs.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/162/files/70019-009.pdf"},"version_id":"1971537a-494f-43d7-a0a3-8b7a1c398bad"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"授業評価","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"評価スケール","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"基礎看護技術演習","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"evaluation of training crass","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"evaluation scale","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"training class for basic nursing technique","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"基礎看護技術演習過程の評価 : 「看護系大学授業評価スケール<看護技術演習用>」を用いて","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"基礎看護技術演習過程の評価 : 「看護系大学授業評価スケール<看護技術演習用>」を用いて","subitem_title_language":"ja"},{"subitem_title":"Evaluation of Training Class for Basic Nursing Technique : Evaluation of Basic Nursing Technique Training Class using The Nursing System University Class Process Evaluation Scale","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"3","owner":"21","path":["21"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2010-03-28"},"publish_date":"2010-03-28","publish_status":"0","recid":"162","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["基礎看護技術演習過程の評価 : 「看護系大学授業評価スケール<看護技術演習用>」を用いて"],"weko_creator_id":"21","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-12-04T06:34:59.570177+00:00"}